◆Comparison
MotionWorks vs Brightcove
An objective comparison. Different philosophies — Brightcove is fully managed SaaS, MotionWorks is self-hosted with total infrastructure freedom.
§ AFeature Matrix
| Feature | MotionWorks | Brightcove |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted (your servers) | ◆ | · |
| Data ownership | ◆ | · |
| Open source | ◆ | · |
| Free tier | ◆ | · |
| Encoder agnostic (19 providers) | ◆ | · |
| Storage agnostic (9 providers) | ◆ | · |
| CDN agnostic (9+ providers) | ◆ | · |
| Social OTT features | ◆ | · |
| Built-in ad engine (SSAI) | ◆ | ○ |
| White-label OTT | ◆ | ◆ |
| Video management CMS | ◆ | ◆ |
| Live streaming | ◆ | ◆ |
| Analytics dashboard | ◆ | ◆ |
| Enterprise support | ◆ | ◆ |
| Global CDN included | · | ◆ |
| Managed infrastructure | ○ | ◆ |
§ BDecision Guide
Choose Brightcove
When to choose Brightcove
Brightcove is excellent if you want a fully managed solution where you don't manage any servers.
◆ Choose MotionWorks
When to choose MotionWorks
MotionWorks is for teams that want total control over their data, infrastructure, and costs.
§ ∞Continue
Take it home
Try MotionWorks free
Deploy on your own servers. All features included. Free forever.